Less might be more, but not in science

  • T.L.N. Järvinen
    Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Meilahti Bridge Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
    Search for articles by this author
Published:February 17, 2023DOI:
      A monstrous crisis of credibility is ravaging medical research, making true replicant findings a treasure. If we fail to value them, we risk ruining trust in medicine (see Fig. 1).
      Fig. 1
      Fig. 1A multi-faceted crisis of credibility and public trust, a bit like the mythological many-headed Hydra, is ravaging the realm of medical science. To restore credibility and trust, we need to keep wielding our most treasured weapon in the fight: science, and then even more science.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ioannidis J.P.
        Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.
        JAMA. 2005; 294: 218-228
        • Herrera-Perez D.
        • Haslam A.
        • Crain T.
        • Gill J.
        • Livingston C.
        • Kaestner V.
        • et al.
        A comprehensive review of randomized clinical trials in three medical journals reveals 396 medical reversals.
        Elife. 2019; 8
        • Howick J.
        • Koletsi D.
        • Ioannidis J.P.A.
        • Madigan C.
        • Pandis N.
        • Loef M.
        • et al.
        Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2022; 148: 160-169
        • Greenhalgh T.
        • Howick J.
        • Maskrey N.
        • Evidence based medicine renaissance group
        Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?.
        BMJ. 2014; 348: g3725
        • Jureidini J.
        • McHenry L.B.
        The illusion of evidence based medicine.
        BMJ. 2022; 376: o702
        • Harris I.A.
        • Buchbinder R.
        How doctors are betraying the Hippocratic oath.
        BMJ. 2021; 375: n2807
        • Ioannidis J.P.A.
        Hijacked evidence-based medicine: stay the course and throw the pirates overboard.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 84: 11-13
        • Siemieniuk R.A.C.
        • Harris I.A.
        • Agoritsas T.
        • Poolman R.W.
        • Brignardello-Petersen R.
        • Van de Velde S.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee arthritis and meniscal tears: a clinical practice guideline.
        BMJ. 2017; 357: j1982
        • Howard D.H.
        Trends in the use of knee arthroscopy in adults.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178: 1557-1558
        • Ardern C.L.
        • Paatela T.
        • Mattila V.
        • Taimela S.
        • Jarvinen T.L.N.
        When taking a step back is a veritable leap forward. Reversing decades of arthroscopy for managing joint pain: five reasons that could explain declining rates of common arthroscopic surgeries.
        Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54: 1312-1313
        • Reito A.
        Global Volume of Knee Arthroscopy Surgeries. 2023;
        • Chan E.W.
        • Chaulk R.C.
        • Cheng Y.
        • Shin J.
        No decrease in incidence of arthroscopic meniscectomy in a Canadian province.
        Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 4223-4231
        • Lopez-Vega M.
        • Domenech-Fernandez J.
        • Peiro S.
        • Ridao-Lopez M.
        Has arthroscopic meniscectomy use changed in response to the evidence? A large-database study from Spain.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023; 481: 7-16
        • Wijn S.R.W.
        • Hannink G.
        • Østerås H.
        • Risberg M.A.
        • Roos E.M.
        • Hare K.B.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus non-surgical or sham treatment in patients with MRI-confirmed degenerative meniscus tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis with individual participant data from 605 randomised patients.
        Osteoarthr Cartil. 2023; (in press)
        • Williams B.A.
        Perils of evidence-based medicine.
        Perspect Biol Med. 2010; 53: 106-120
        • Leopold S.S.
        Editorial: the new AAOS Guidelines on knee arthroscopy for degenerative meniscus tears are a step in the wrong direction.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022; 480: 1-3
        • van de Graaf V.A.
        • Bloembergen C.M.
        • Willigenburg N.W.P.
        • Noorduyn J.C.A.M.
        • Saris D.B.
        • Harris I.A.
        • et al.
        Can even experienced orthopaedic surgeons predict who will benefit from surgery when patients present with degenerative meniscal tears? A survey of 194 orthopaedic surgeons who made 3880 predictions.
        Br J Sport Med. 2020; 54: 354-359
        • Abram S.G.F.
        • Beard D.J.
        • Price A.J.
        • Group B.M.W.
        Arthroscopic meniscal surgery: a national society treatment guideline and consensus statement.
        Bone Jt J. 2019; 101-B: 652-659
        • Pihl K.
        • Ensor J.
        • Peat G.
        • Englund M.
        • Lohmander S.
        • Jorgensen U.
        • et al.
        Wild goose chase — no predictable patient subgroups benefit from meniscal surgery: patient-reported outcomes of 641 patients 1 year after surgery.
        Br J Sport Med. 2020; 54: 13-22
        • Leopold S.S.
        Editor's spotlight/take 5: has arthroscopic meniscectomy use changed in response to the evidence? A large-database study from Spain.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023; 481: 2-6