If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the world. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been studied to treat OA. This review was performed to systematically assess the quality of literature and compare the procedural specifics surrounding MSC therapy for osteoarthritis.
Design
PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies using MSCs for OA treatment (final search December 2017). Outcomes of interest included study evidence level, patient demographics, MSC protocol, treatment results and adverse events. Level I and II evidence articles were further analyzed.
Results
Sixty-one of 3,172 articles were identified. These studies treated 2,390 patients with osteoarthritis. Most used adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) (n = 29) or bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) (n = 30) though the preparation varied within group. 57% of the sixty-one studies were level IV evidence, leaving five level I and nine level II studies containing 288 patients to be further analyzed. Eight studies used BMSCs, five ADSCs and one peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). The risk of bias in these studies showed five level I studies at low risk with seven level II at moderate and two at high risk.
Conclusion
While studies support the notion that MSC therapy has a positive effect on OA patients, there is limited high quality evidence and long-term follow-up. The present study summarizes the specifics of high level evidence studies and identifies a lack of consistency, including a diversity of MSC preparations, and thus a lack of reproducibility amongst these articles’ methods.
OA is the common end-point of many different pathologies. As such, its etiology is varied, involving both intrinsic joint and extrinsic environmental factors. Age, gender, menopause, genetics, nutrition and bone density often lead to increased susceptibility to OA. These systemic factors, in addition to mechanical factors such as weight/body mass index, injury, surgery, and deformity help determine the location and severity of an individual's OA
Existing treatments for OA are largely unsatisfactory. Pharmacologic management includes acetaminophen, aspirin and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: the chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative.
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Res Soc.2010 Apr; 18: 476-499
A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: the chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative.
. These drugs are recommended secondarily to patient education, strengthening exercises, and weight loss. Physical and occupational therapy have also demonstrated beneficial effects
A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: the chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative.
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Res Soc.2010 Apr; 18: 476-499
These conservative treatments may be sufficient for early management, but their role in modifying underlying structural abnormalities is limited. The OA Research Society International suggests patients consider surgical interventions if daily pain persists for months and conservative management has failed
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Res Soc.2010 Apr; 18: 476-499
. Total joint replacements have thus become important in the management of severe OA. In elderly populations, the prevalence of joint replacements due to OA is 13.6%
Incidence and prevalence of total joint replacements due to osteoarthritis in the elderly: risk factors and factors associated with late life prevalence in the AGES-Reykjavik Study.
. However, ongoing research aims to develop less invasive procedures for management.
Less invasive procedures such as intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet rich plasma (PRP), hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy and anabolic cartilaginous agents are being studied as potential therapies
. Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is an increasingly common adjuvant therapy that has shown promising results. A 2014 proof-of-concept trial demonstrated that intra-articular injection of MSCs into OA knees improved function and pain without adverse events
. In a systematic review of the safety of intra-articular therapy, 844 procedures (mean follow-up 21 months) were analyzed to find only four serious adverse events: one infection post-bone marrow aspiration that resolved with antibiotics, one pulmonary embolus two weeks after aspiration, and two adverse events reported as unrelated to the therapy. Other sequelae included pain, swelling and dehydration after aspiration
. A more recent assessment of adverse events of autologous stem cell therapies found they primarily included post-procedural pain or pain due to progressive degenerative joint disease in under 4% of the population.
A multi-center analysis of adverse events among two thousand, three hundred and seventy two adult patients undergoing adult autologous stem cell therapy for orthopaedic conditions.
The International Society for Cellular Therapy developed criteria to define MSCs as plastic-adherent in culture conditions expressing CD105, CD73, and CD90, lacking expression of CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79alpha or CD19, and HLA-DR surface molecules, and possessing tri-lineage differentiation into osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondroblasts
. However, the term MSC is not always used in the literature with this definition in mind. Evidence supporting the immunomodulatory role of MSCs suggests the term “stem cell” is a misnomer and the name be changed to medicinal signaling cells
, though this change has yet to be reflected in the literature. The immunomodulatory properties of MSCs, however, have been postulated to have the capacity to play a role in manipulation of the disease process. These properties include anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotive, anti-fibrotic, angiogenic, mitogenic and wound-healing paracrine activity.
Human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue and skin exhibit differences in molecular phenotype and differentiation potential.
The potential of intra-articular injection of chondrogenic-induced bone marrow stem cells to retard the progression of osteoarthritis in a sheep model.
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Combination of intra-articular autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells with growth factor addition/preservation and hyaluronic acid in conjunction with arthroscopic microdrilling mesenchymal cell stimulation Improves quality of life and regenerates articular cartilage in early osteoarthritic knee disease.
J Med Assoc Thail = Chot Thangphaet.2013 May; 96: 580-588
Articular cartilage regeneration with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells and hyaluronic acid after arthroscopic subchondral drilling: a report of 5 cases with histology.
Arthroscopy: J Arthrosc Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2011 Apr; 27: 493-506
The above MSCs can be isolated, culture-expanded and subsequently injected into joints. Other intra-articular formulations with one-step harvest and injection procedures are becoming popular, including injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) containing BMSCs, stromal vascular fraction (SVF) isolated from lipoaspirate containing ADSCs, and microfragmented adipose tissue, a non-enzymatic approach to isolating the stromal vascular niche with ADSCs. SVF is isolated via liposuction, followed by collagenase digestion, centrifugation, and dilution
. BMAC contains a mixture of platelets, red and white blood cells, and hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic precursors. The term refers to the mixture of marrow elements and MSCs, but, after processing, only 0.001–0.01% of the cells are MSCs
. The SVF product contains MSCs, pericytes, fibroblasts, monocytes and macrophages, with 500,000 to 2,00,000 cells per gram of which 1–10% are considered ADSCs
. Microfragmented adipose tissue is obtained by harvesting lipoaspirate and washing off residues while adipose cluster dimensions are gradually reduced. Initial analysis has shown it contains preserved stromal vascular architecture with pericytes and MSCs
Although MSC therapy has been used to treat articular cartilage repair for years, few clinical studies provide satisfactory levels of evidence to address the quality of available information. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery's (JBJS) Levels of Evidence rating scale defines parameters to help authors make level of evidence evaluations (level I, randomized controlled trial; level II, prospective cohort study or observational study with dramatic effect; level III, retrospective cohort study or case–control study; level IV, case series; level V, mechanism-based reasoning)
. These parameters help inform physicians' clinical decisions.
To our knowledge, there has been no systematic review which analyzes the effect of study quality and procedural specifics of both autologous and allogeneic MSC therapy for the treatment of OA. The aims of this investigation are to provide an analysis of the literature regarding the use of MSC therapy for OA treatment, to assess the quality of evidence, and to propose next steps for further investigation.
Methods
Search strategy
This review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines
. A literature search identified all articles involving stem cell therapy to treat osteoarthitis. PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using “osteoarthritis” and “stem cell” MeSH terms presented in further detail in the appendix. Computer de-duplication was performed. The search was finalized in December 2017. Manual review of the references of selected articles was also completed to add studies that were originally missed.
Study selection
Two reviewers (DJ and AA) independently evaluated studies. Third and fourth reviewers (TE and EC) resolved any discrepancies for inclusion. After identifying the relevant studies through abstract information, studies were included after full-text evaluation. Inclusion criteria was any clinical study that used stem cells to treat osteoarthritis in humans. Outcome measures varied amongst articles. These measures included safety analyzed by the nature of adverse events, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic MRI or X-ray scores, as well as several others. Articles from any country were acceptable but limited to those published in the English language. Exclusion criteria were articles that did not use MSCs to directly treat OA patients, that were reviews, conference submissions/abstracts only or letters to the editor, that studied stem cells in vitro, that studied isolated, focal chondral defects not associated with OA, and that presented their research in a language other than English.
Data extraction and assessment of study quality
Authors (DJ and AA) independently extracted data using a template data extraction sheet, with third and fourth researchers (TE and EC) serving as tiebreakers if consensus was not achieved. Information gathered included study characteristics, patient demographics and outcomes. Primary outcome was the improvement, or lack thereof, in the patients' OA. Studies were rated on methodological quality according to The JBJS Levels of Evidence rating scale
Because of overall study heterogeneity and lack of adequate control groups, a formal statistical meta-analysis was attempted but not performed; however, pooled rates of several collected measures were calculated with the available data using Microsoft Excel when applicable.
Results
Literature search
The initial search of the three databases yielded a total of 3,416 articles. Nine articles were identified through other sources. Duplicates were removed and 3,172 articles remained. Of these articles, 381 were selected as relevant to the application of stem cell therapy for OA treatment. Of those articles, 61 were chosen to be discussed in this review due to their clinical nature. The PRISMA flow diagram can be visualized in Fig. 1. According to Marx, Wilson and Swiontkowski (2015), five studies classified as level I evidence, nine as level II, seven as level III, thirty-five as level IV, and five as level V.
Fig. 1Osteoarthritis and stem cell therapy PRISMA flow diagram.
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
One-step" bone marrow-derived cells transplantation and joint debridement for osteochondral lesions of the talus in ankle osteoarthritis: clinical and radiological outcomes at 36 months.
A prospective multi-site registry study of a specific protocol of autologous bone marrow concentrate for the treatment of shoulder rotator cuff tears and osteoarthritis.
Safety and complications reporting update on the re-implantation of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells using autologous platelet lysate technique.
Management of knee osteoarthritis by combined stromal vascular fraction cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma, and musculoskeletal exercises: a case series.
Injection of mesenchymal stem cells as a supplementary Strategy of marrow stimulation improves cartilage regeneration after lateral sliding calcaneal osteotomy for varus ankle osteoarthritis: clinical and second-look arthroscopic results.
Regeneration of human bones in hip osteonecrosis and human cartilage in knee osteoarthritis with autologous adipose-tissue-derived stem cells: a case series.
Cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritic patients by a composite of allogeneic umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells and hyaluronate hydrogel: results from a clinical trial for safety and proof-of-concept with 7 years of extended follow-up.
Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma to treat patellofemoral osteoarthritis: preliminary results of a long-term pilot study.
Final results of a phase I-II trial using ex vivo expanded autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee confirming safety and suggesting cartilage regeneration.
Safety of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for cartilage repair in 41 patients with 45 joints followed for up to 11 years and 5 months.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Percutaneous injection of autologous, culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells into carpometacarpal hand joints: a case series with an untreated comparison group.
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years' follow-up.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Sur: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2013 Dec; 29: 2020-2028
FDA US. 21 CFR 1271.3 - How Does FDA Define Important Terms in This Part? Code of Federal Regulations - Title 21: Food and Drugs. In: Services DoHaH, editor. 2016.
provides individual study details organized by level of evidence. Of the total study population, 2,662 joints were treated and 46% were female (N = 1095). OA sites included knee (51 studies), hand (2 studies), ankle (3 studies), shoulder (1 study), hip (2 studies) or multiple joints (2 studies with knee, hip and ankle).
Management of knee osteoarthritis by combined stromal vascular fraction cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma, and musculoskeletal exercises: a case series.
Safety of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for cartilage repair in 41 patients with 45 joints followed for up to 11 years and 5 months.
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
Percutaneous injection of autologous, culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells into carpometacarpal hand joints: a case series with an untreated comparison group.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years' follow-up.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Sur: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2013 Dec; 29: 2020-2028
Injection of mesenchymal stem cells as a supplementary Strategy of marrow stimulation improves cartilage regeneration after lateral sliding calcaneal osteotomy for varus ankle osteoarthritis: clinical and second-look arthroscopic results.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
One-step" bone marrow-derived cells transplantation and joint debridement for osteochondral lesions of the talus in ankle osteoarthritis: clinical and radiological outcomes at 36 months.
Safety and complications reporting update on the re-implantation of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells using autologous platelet lysate technique.
A prospective multi-site registry study of a specific protocol of autologous bone marrow concentrate for the treatment of shoulder rotator cuff tears and osteoarthritis.
A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: the chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative.
A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: the chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative.
Management of knee osteoarthritis by combined stromal vascular fraction cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma, and musculoskeletal exercises: a case series.
Regeneration of human bones in hip osteonecrosis and human cartilage in knee osteoarthritis with autologous adipose-tissue-derived stem cells: a case series.
Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma to treat patellofemoral osteoarthritis: preliminary results of a long-term pilot study.
Final results of a phase I-II trial using ex vivo expanded autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee confirming safety and suggesting cartilage regeneration.
Combination of intra-articular autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells with growth factor addition/preservation and hyaluronic acid in conjunction with arthroscopic microdrilling mesenchymal cell stimulation Improves quality of life and regenerates articular cartilage in early osteoarthritic knee disease.
J Med Assoc Thail = Chot Thangphaet.2013 May; 96: 580-588
Safety of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for cartilage repair in 41 patients with 45 joints followed for up to 11 years and 5 months.
In the 61 clinical studies, MSC type varied between ADSCs (29 studies), BMSCs (30 studies), and PBSCs (3 studies), and allogeneic umbilical cord-derived MSCs (1 study), taking into account that two studies used both ADSCs and BMSCs
. Among these studies, the processing and injected/implanted form also differed. ADSCs were either culture-expanded (n = 3), within SVF (n = 24) or microfragmented adipose tissue (n = 2). BMSCs were either culture-expanded (n = 18), within BMAC (n = 10), or allogenic (n = 2). Three studies used PBSCs and one study used allogeneic umbilical cord-derived MSCs. Several adjuvants were injected/implanted with the MSCs, including PRP (n = 20), platelet lysate (n = 8), and hyaluronic acid (n = 10). The median follow-up time was 12 months with a range of 3–84 months.
To better understand the quality of the literature pertaining to MSCs as OA therapy, the fourteen Level I and Level II articles were analyzed further.
Levels I–II only: study characteristics
Of the fourteen Level I and Level II evidence articles, 288 total patients were studied. Sixty-three percent of these patients were female (n = 181). Thirteen studies treated knee OA and 1 treated hand OA. Study characteristics of the Level I and II studies can be found in Table II. As depicted in Table III, the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I risk of bias quality assessment yielded five studies at low risk of bias, seven at moderate/some concerns risk, and two at high risk.
Table IIIRisk of Bias assessment using Cochrane's RoB 2.0 Scale for level I evidence studies and ROBINS-I scale for level II evidence studies
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
Percutaneous injection of autologous, culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells into carpometacarpal hand joints: a case series with an untreated comparison group.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years' follow-up.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Sur: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2013 Dec; 29: 2020-2028
In the Levels I and II cohort, 288 patients received MSC therapy. MSC regimen varied; a summary of the intervention details can be found in Table IV. Eight studies used BMSCs collected from the iliac crest. Of these, four were culture-expanded, 2 were BMAC and 2 were allogeneic. Five studies used ADSCs with four derived from abdominal fat and one from the buttocks. Of these five studies, 3 were culture-expanded injecting a range of 2 × 106 to 100 × 106 ADSCs and 2 were from SVF injecting a magnitude of 107 SVF cells with one study estimating this as 4.11 × 106 ADSCs
. Turajane, Chaveewanakown, Fongsarun, Aojanepong and Papadopoulos (2017) was the only one of these studies to inject 3 ml PBSCs containing a range of 1.095–1.276 × 106 total nucleated cells. This study employed three injections and compared groups that received microdriling, PBSC, growth factor addition, and HA (group 1) vs PBSC, PRP, HA (group 2) vs HA alone (group 3). The mean follow-up length of time for all studies was 14 ± 7 mo (Range 6 to 24)
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
Arthroscopic microdrilling (group 1, 2) followed by intra-operative, intra-articular injection of: Group 1: PBSC, GFA, HA Group 2: PBSC, PRP, HA Group 3: HA only
Percutaneous injection of autologous, culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells into carpometacarpal hand joints: a case series with an untreated comparison group.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years' follow-up.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Sur: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2013 Dec; 29: 2020-2028
All 61 clinical studies reported some level of improvement of OA symptoms from baseline in the MSC therapy group. Main findings of outcome assessments in level I and II studies can be found in Table V
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
. Although there was overlap between outcome measures between included Level I and II articles, no meta-analysis was performed due to the diversity of metrics and outcomes. The most common measures were VAS (n = 10), WOMAC (n = 9), safety (n = 6) and radiologic evidence (n = 5).
Table VOutcome assessments of the included level I and II evidence studies
One-step" bone marrow-derived cells transplantation and joint debridement for osteochondral lesions of the talus in ankle osteoarthritis: clinical and radiological outcomes at 36 months.
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
Percutaneous injection of autologous, culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells into carpometacarpal hand joints: a case series with an untreated comparison group.
Low dose: 43.4 ± 12.7 vs 25.3 ± 19.5 Mid-dose: 69.0 ± 5.9 vs 48.5 ± 11.0 High dose: 54.2 ± 5.2 vs 32.8 ± 6.3
No, P = 0.339 No, P = 0.391 Yes, P = 0.003
N/A
N/A
Safety
No treatment-related adverse events
N/A
N/A
N/A
VAS
Low dose: 70.0 ± 10.0 vs 48.3 ± 14.8 Mid-dose: 78.3 ± 1.7 vs 67.5 ± 11.5 High dose: 79.6 ± 2.2 vs 44.2 ± 6.3
No, P = 0.069 No, P = 0.486 Yes, P = 0.000
N/A
N/A
KSS Knee score KSS Function score
Low dose: 41.3 ± 6.8 vs 79.0 ± 12.5 Mid-dose: 35.3 ± 9.8 vs 47.3 ± 6.8 High dose: 47.2 ± 2.6 vs 71.0 ± 4.4 Low dose: 60.0 ± 5.8 vs 83.3 ± 8.8 Mid-dose: 56.7 ± 6.7 vs 70.0 ± 7.6 High dose: 70.8 ± 2.6 vs 77.5 ± 2.5
Yes, P = 0.025 No, P = 0.324 Yes, P = 0.000 Yes, P = 0.020 No, P = 0.333 No, P = 0.120
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
Radiographic: depth of cartilage defect, Radiographic: articular cartilage volume)
High dose cohort, (at medial femoral and tibial condyles): 497.9 ± 29.7 vs 297.9 ± 51.2 333.2 ± 51.2 vs 170.6 ± 48.2 High dose cohort, (at medial femoral and tibial condyles): 3313.7 ± 304.1 vs 3780.6 ± 284.4 1157.5 ± 145.8 vs 1407.7 ± 150.5
Yes, P < .05 Yes, P < 0.05
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Jo (2017)93
Dose-escalation cohorts (No placebo)
WOMAC
Low dose: 43.3 ± 12.7 vs 17.0 ± 9.8 Mid-dose: 69.0 ± 5.9 vs 25.1 ± 11.0 High dose: 54.2 ± 5.2 vs 19.0 ± 5.5
No, P = 0.083 No, P = 0.210 Yes, P < 0.001
N/A
N/A
VAS
Low dose: 70.0 ± 10.0 vs 40.0 ± 15.3 Mid-dose: 78.3 ± 1.7 vs 66.0 ± 14.7 Low dose: 79.6 ± 2.2 vs 45.8 ± 8.1
Yes, P = 0.035 No, P = 0.601 Yes, P = 0.002
N/A
N/A
KSS Knee score KSS Function score
Low dose: 41.3 ± 6.8 vs 71.0 ± 12.1 Mid-dose 35.3 ± 9.8 vs 70.8 ± 12.8 High dose: 47.2 ± 2.6 vs 79.3 ± 4.7 Low dose: 60.0 ± 5.8 vs 86.7 ± 3.3 Mid-dose: 56.7 ± 6.7 vs 73.3 ± 11. High dose: 70.8 ± 2.6 vs 83.3 ± 3.8
Yes, P = 0.031 No, P = 0.241 Yes, P =< 0.001 Yes. P = 0.015 No, P = 0.439 Yes, P = 0.026 But, plateaus at 1 year F/U
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
KOOS pain score KOOS symptom score KOOS activities of daily living score
Low dose: 49.1 ± 4.0 vs 69.4 ± 12.7 Mid-dose: 30.6 ± 12.1 vs 61.0 ± 9.9 High dose: 32.6 ± 4.1 vs 76.4 ± 5.4 Low dose: 61.9 ± 7.2 vs 72.6 ± 5.2 Mid-dose: 39.3 ± 16.4 vs 76.9 ± 10.5 High dose: 48.5 ± 5.3 vs 72.9 ± 5.2 Low dose: 58.8 ± 10.0 vs 81.9 ± 9.7 Mid-dose: 22.5 ± 6.0 vs 73.1 ± 12.7 High dose: 28.6 ± 3.6 vs 33.9 ± 3.0
No, P = 0.148 No, P = 0.220 Yes, P < 0.001 Yes, P = 0.035 No, P = 0.214 Yes, P = 0.003 Yes, P = 0.001 No, P = 0.237 Yes, P < 0.001
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
Radiographic (MRI)
No significant change in joint space width, mechanical or anatomic axis. Low dose: no significant change in cartilage defect High dose: regenerated cartilage 6 months. not 2 years
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years' follow-up.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Sur: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2013 Dec; 29: 2020-2028
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Percutaneous injection of autologous, culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells into carpometacarpal hand joints: a case series with an untreated comparison group.
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
found VAS improvements at 1 week (P = 0.0003), 1 month (P < 0.0001), and 6 months (P < 0.0001). Notably, the BMSC-treated group VAS pain score (0.92 ± 1.29) was lower compared to the daily acetaminophen placebo group (4.64 ± 2.43). Vega et al.
found BMSC-treated patients demonstrated significant VAS improvement at 6 months, whereas placebo HA-treated patients did not significantly improve until 12 months. Similarly, Koh et al.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
found that both ADSC-treated patients and PRP-placebo patients improved their VAS scores at 6 and 12 months, but the ADSC-treated group demonstrated a greater VAS improvement (10.2 ± 5.7) than the placebo group (16.2 ± 4.6). Additionally, Nguyen et al.
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
found the ADSC-treated group (3.47 ± 0.74) improved significantly compared to the microfracture placebo group (2.08 ± 1.08). The remaining studies measuring VAS exhibited improvement upon follow-up but the improvement was either not statistically significant
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Percutaneous injection of autologous, culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells into carpometacarpal hand joints: a case series with an untreated comparison group.
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
also found significantly better WOMAC scores in PBSC-treated groups (WOMAC = 52 or 75) compared to the HA-placebo group (WOMAC = 126.8) at 12 months (P < 0.001). Two studies recorded improved WOMAC scores, but not when compared to placebo groups
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
. Four studies found no serious events as a consequence to MSC-treatment, but patients noted mild pain and swelling post-treatment that was treated with ibuprofen
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
. There is, however, some question of sustainability of radiologic outcomes. Jo et al. (2017) found that although at 6 months cartilage defect size decreased and cartilage volume increased, the change plateaued by the two-year follow-up
Efficacy and safety of adult human bone marrow-derived, cultured, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (Stempeucel(R)): preclinical and clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Intra-articular injection of two different doses of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (phase I/II).
Avoidance of total knee arthroplasty in early osteoarthritis of the knee with intra-articular implantation of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells versus hyaluronic acid: a randomized controlled trial with differential effects of growth factor addition.
Percutaneous injection of autologous, culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells into carpometacarpal hand joints: a case series with an untreated comparison group.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years' follow-up.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Sur: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2013 Dec; 29: 2020-2028
Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study.
Arthroscopy: J Arthroscopic Relat Dis: Off Pub Arthroscopy Assoc North America Int Arthroscopy Assoc.2014 Nov; 30: 1453-1460
Comparative clinical observation of arthroscopic microfracture in the presence and absence of a stromal vascular fraction injection for osteoarthritis.