Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume 18, Issue 9 , Pages 1117-1126, September 2010

Efficacy of ultrasound therapy for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis

  • A. Loyola-Sánchez

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Adalberto Loyola-Sánchez, School of Rehabilitation Science, IAHS – 403, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 1C7. Tel: 1-905-525-9140x26410.
  • ,
  • J. Richardson

      Affiliations

    • Tel: 1-905-525-9140x27811.
  • ,
  • N.J. MacIntyre

      Affiliations

    • Tel: 1-905-525-9140x21166.

School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Canada

Received 5 January 2010; accepted 17 June 2010. published online 15 July 2010.

Summary 

Objective

To assess the efficacy of ultrasound therapy (US) for decreasing pain and improving physical function, patient-perception of disease severity, and cartilage repair in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review (to February 2009) without language limits in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, MEDCARIB, CINAHL, PEDro, SPORT-discus, REHABDATA, and World Health Organization Clinical Trial Registry. We included randomized controlled trials of people with knee OA comparing the outcomes of interest for those receiving US with those receiving no US. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted relevant data and assessed quality. Pooled analyses were conducted using inverse-variance random effects models.

Main results

Six small trials (378 patients) were included. US improves pain [Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) (95% confidence interval (CI))=−0.49 (−0.79, −0.18), P=0.002], and tends to improve self-reported physical function [SMD (CI)=−0.54 (−1.19, 0.12), P=0.11] along with walking performance [SMD (CI)=0.81 (−0.09, 1.72), P=0.08]. Results from two trials (128 patients), conducted by the same group, show a positive effect of US on pain [SMD (CI)=−0.77 (−1.15, −0.39), P<0.001], self-reported physical function [SMD (CI)=−1.25 (−1.69, −0.81), P<0.001], and walking performance [SMD (CI)=1.47 (1.06, 1.88), P<0.001] at 10 months after the intervention concluded. Heterogeneity observed between studies regarding the effect of US on pain was explained by US dose, mode and intensity. The quality of evidence supporting these effect estimates was rated as low.

Conclusions

US could be efficacious for decreasing pain and may improve physical function in patients with knee OA. The findings of this review should be confirmed using methodologically rigorous and adequately powered clinical trials.

Keywords: Ultrasound, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Meta-analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1063-4584(10)00212-8

doi:10.1016/j.joca.2010.06.010

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume 18, Issue 9 , Pages 1117-1126, September 2010