Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume 17, Issue 10 , Pages 1319-1326, October 2009

Computed tomography topographic mapping of subchondral density (CT-TOMASD) in osteoarthritic and normal knees: methodological development and preliminary findings

  • J.D. Johnston

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 1G9, Canada
    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: J. D. Johnston, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 1G9, Canada. Tel: 1-306-966-1468; Fax: 1-306-966-5427.
  • ,
  • B.A. Masri

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • D.R. Wilson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Received 6 August 2008; accepted 12 April 2009. published online 14 September 2009.

Summary 

Objectives

To develop a precise imaging tool which measures three-dimensional (3D) subchondral bone mineral density (BMD), and investigate its ability to distinguish subchondral bone properties in osteoarthritic and normal cadaveric tibiae.

Methods

We developed a novel imaging tool [Computed tomography topographic mapping of subchondral density (CT-TOMASD)], which employs a surface projection image processing technique to map 3D subchondral BMD measured in relation to depth from the joint surface. Sixteen intact cadaver knees from 10 donors (8M:2F; age: 77.8±7.4) were scanned using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Projections of average BMD to normalized depths of 2.5mm and 5.0mm were acquired, with regional analyses including: (1) medial and lateral BMD, (2) anterior/central/posterior compartmental BMD, (3) max BMD contained within a 10mm diameter ‘core’, and (4) medial:lateral BMD ratio. Precision was assessed using coefficients of variation (CV%). Osteoarthritis (OA) severity was assessed by examination of computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopic radiographic images, and categorized using modified Kellgren–Lawrence (mKL) scoring.

Results

Precision errors for CT-TOMASD BMD measures were focused around 1.5%, reaching a maximum CV% of 3.5%. OA was identified in eight compartments of six knees. Substantial qualitative and quantitative differences were observed between the OA and normal knees, with the medial:lateral BMD ratio and peak core regional analyses demonstrating differences greater than 4.7 standard deviations (SDs) when compared with normals. Preliminary results revealed effect sizes ranging from 1.6 to 4.3 between OA and normal knees.

Conclusions

CT-TOMASD offers precise 3D measures of subchondral BMD. Preliminary results demonstrate large qualitative and quantitative differences and large effect sizes between OA and normal knees. This method has the potential to identify and quantify changes in subchondral BMD associated with OA disease progression.

Key words: Subchondral bone, Bone mineral density, Computed tomography, Proximal tibia, Osteoarthritis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1063-4584(09)00111-3

doi:10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.013

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume 17, Issue 10 , Pages 1319-1326, October 2009