Comparison of pharmacokinetics of glucosamine and synovial fluid levels following administration of glucosamine sulphate or glucosamine hydrochloride1
Summary
Objective
To compare the pharmacokinetics of glucosamine and the synovial fluid levels attained following treatment with glucosamine sulphate or glucosamine hydrochloride in a large animal model at clinically relevant doses.
Methods
Eight adult female horses were used. Crystalline glucosamine sulphate (Dona®) or glucosamine hydrochloride was administered at a dose of 20
mg/kg by either intravenous (IV) injection or nasogastric (NG) intubation. Plasma samples were collected before dosing and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 360, 480 and 720
min after dosing. Synovial fluid samples were collected from the radiocarpal joints within 48
h before dosing and at 1, 6 and 12
h post-dosing. Glucosamine was assayed by Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-ESI/MS/MS).
Results
Plasma concentrations reached ∼50
μg/mL after IV injection and ∼1
μg/mL after NG administration of both types of glucosamine. The median oral bioavailability was 9.4% for glucosamine sulphate and 6.1% for glucosamine hydrochloride. Synovial fluid concentrations were significantly higher at 1 and 6
h following oral treatment with glucosamine sulphate compared to glucosamine hydrochloride. Twelve hours following oral administration, glucosamine levels in the plasma and the synovial fluid were still significantly higher than baseline for the glucosamine sulphate preparation, but not for the hydrochloride preparation.
Conclusion
Following oral administration of a clinically recommended dose of glucosamine sulphate (Dona®), significantly higher synovial fluid concentrations of glucosamine are attained, when compared to an equivalent dose of glucosamine hydrochloride. Whether this difference is translated into a therapeutic effect on the joint tissues remains to be elucidated.
Key words: Glucosamine, Cartilage, Osteoarthritis, Neutraceutical, Horse
To access this article, please choose from the options below
1 This study was supported by the Groupe de Recherche en Médecine Équine du Québec, the Fonds du Centenaire, the Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire of the Université de Montréal and the Canadian Arthritis Network.
PII: S1063-4584(08)00004-6
doi:10.1016/j.joca.2008.01.006
© 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
