Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume 18, Issue 9 , Pages 1174-1182, September 2010

Surface grafting of biocompatible phospholipid polymer MPC provides wear resistance of tibial polyethylene insert in artificial knee joints

  • T. Moro

      Affiliations

    • Department of Science for Joint Reconstruction, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • ,
  • Y. Takatori

      Affiliations

    • Department of Science for Joint Reconstruction, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • ,
  • M. Kyomoto

      Affiliations

    • Department of Science for Joint Reconstruction, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • ,
  • K. Ishihara

      Affiliations

    • Department of Materials Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • ,
  • K. Saiga

      Affiliations

    • Department of Science for Joint Reconstruction, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • ,
  • K. Nakamura

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sensory & Motor System Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • ,
  • H. Kawaguchi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sensory & Motor System Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Hiroshi Kawaguchi, Sensory & Motor System Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. Tel: 81-3-3815-5411x30473; Fax: 81-3-3818-4082.

Received 20 January 2010; accepted 29 May 2010. published online 14 July 2010.

Summary 

Objective

Aseptic loosening of artificial knee joints induced by wear particles from a tibial polyethylene (PE) insert is a serious problem limiting their longevity. This study investigated the effects of grafting with our original biocompatible phospholipid polymer 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) on the insert surface.

Methods

The hydrophilicity of the PE surface was determined by the contact angle of a water droplet, and the friction torque was measured against a cobalt–chromium alloy component. The wear amount was compared among PE inserts with or without cross-linking and MPC grafting during 5×106 cycles of loading in a knee joint simulator. The surfaces of the insert and the wear particles in the lubricant were subjected to electron and laser microscopic analyses. The mechanical properties of the inserts were evaluated by the small punch test.

Results

The MPC grafting increased hydrophilicity and decreased friction torque. In the simulator experiment, the wear of the tibial insert was significantly suppressed in the cross-linked PE (CLPE) insert, and even more dramatically decreased in the MPC-grafted CLPE insert, as compared to that in the non-cross-linked PE insert. Surface analyses confirmed the wear resistance by the cross-linking, and further by the MPC grafting. The particle size distribution was not affected by cross-linking or MPC grafting. The mechanical properties of the insert material remained unchanged during the loading regardless of the cross-linking or grafting.

Conclusion

Surface grafting with MPC polymer furnished the PE insert with wear resistance in an artificial knee joint through increased hydrophilicity and decreased friction torque.

Keywords: Artificial knee joint, Arthroplasty, Polyethylene, Wear, Loosening

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1063-4584(10)00211-6

doi:10.1016/j.joca.2010.05.019

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume 18, Issue 9 , Pages 1174-1182, September 2010